Coast Resorts Open Roads Forum: 2023 Power Stroke vs 2023 Ram Cummins Towing Challenge
Open Roads Forum Already a member? Login here.   If not, Register Today!  |  Help

Newest  |  Active  |  Popular  |  RVing FAQ Forum Rules  |  Forum Posting Help and Support  |  Contact  

Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in Tow Vehicles

Open Roads Forum  >  Tow Vehicles

 > 2023 Power Stroke vs 2023 Ram Cummins Towing Challenge

Reply to Topic  |  Subscribe  |  Print Topic  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 7  
Prev  |  Next
4x4ord

Alberta

Senior Member

Joined: 12/23/2010

View Profile



Posted: 07/26/23 08:26am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Cummins12V98 wrote:

4x4ord wrote:

^^^You can call it programming or whatever but it comes down to power. I don't know what grade the hill was that he was pulling but to pull a 14,000 lb trailer up a steep hill at 110 kph takes a lot of power. He was comparing a 385 HP Ram to a 500 HP Ford.... and he says it didn't pull as well on account of the 6 speed transmission,[emoticon].


OK, explain why he had only 22psi boost?


I think he said 24 psi boost at one point. At 2000 rpm the standard output Cummins is not tuned to produce a whole lot of torque ….. no more than the 850 lbft peak torque it makes at 1800 rpm. Does the Cummins need more than 24 psi boost to make 320 hp at 2000 rpm?

The thing is the standard output Cummins is only able to produce about 320 Hp at 2000 rpm and he’s comparing that to a high output Powerstroke that should be able to produce about 420 Hp at 1900 rpm.

* This post was edited 07/26/23 08:49am by 4x4ord *


2023 F350 SRW Platinum short box 4x4.
B&W Companion
2008 Citation Platinum XL 34.5

Cummins12V98

on the road

Senior Member

Joined: 06/03/2012

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 07/26/23 12:57pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

4x4ord wrote:

Cummins12V98 wrote:

4x4ord wrote:

^^^You can call it programming or whatever but it comes down to power. I don't know what grade the hill was that he was pulling but to pull a 14,000 lb trailer up a steep hill at 110 kph takes a lot of power. He was comparing a 385 HP Ram to a 500 HP Ford.... and he says it didn't pull as well on account of the 6 speed transmission,[emoticon].


OK, explain why he had only 22psi boost?


I think he said 24 psi boost at one point. At 2000 rpm the standard output Cummins is not tuned to produce a whole lot of torque ….. no more than the 850 lbft peak torque it makes at 1800 rpm. Does the Cummins need more than 24 psi boost to make 320 hp at 2000 rpm?

The thing is the standard output Cummins is only able to produce about 320 Hp at 2000 rpm and he’s comparing that to a high output Powerstroke that should be able to produce about 420 Hp at 1900 rpm.


Supposedly if it downshifted it would be redline??? I highly doubt that from to 2k to 3.2k.

Something does not sound right about all this. I am NOT disputing the FORD has much more power but.....


2015 RAM LongHorn 3500 Dually CrewCab 4X4 CUMMINS/AISIN RearAir 385HP/865TQ 4:10's
37,800# GCVWR "Towing Beast"

"HeavyWeight" B&W RVK3600

2016 MobileSuites 39TKSB3 highly "Elited" In the stable

2007.5 Mobile Suites 36 SB3 29,000# Combined SOLD

4x4ord

Alberta

Senior Member

Joined: 12/23/2010

View Profile



Posted: 07/26/23 01:17pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

^^^^The guy doesn’t know what he’s talking about. The 68RFE could have dropped to 4th gear at 2000 rpm. That would have caused the engine to rev to 2440 rpm where it would have made enough power to quickly get up to speed…. then it could have upshifted back to 5th where it may or may not have been able to maintain 110 km per hour.
So, instead, it stayed in fifth at about 3 mph under the cruise control set point and slowly gained speed. I don’t see that as a bad thing.

Cummins12V98

on the road

Senior Member

Joined: 06/03/2012

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 07/26/23 04:09pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

It's just that he basically was bad mouthing something he should not have. "Bad transmission it needs more gears", it has gears he could have used them.

Huntindog

Phoenix AZ

Senior Member

Joined: 04/08/2002

View Profile



Posted: 07/26/23 06:48pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Cummins12V98 wrote:

It's just that he basically was bad mouthing something he should not have. "Bad transmission it needs more gears", it has gears he could have used them.

Someday the Ram will have more gears as well. Then these conversations will be moot.
My 2001 Dmax had a 5 speed, the 2011 a 6 speed. and the 2020 a 10 speed. Each tranny performed better than it's predessor.
You will agree once you have one



Huntindog
100% boondocking
2021 Grand Design Momentum 398M
2 bathrooms, no waiting
104 gal grey, 104 black,158 fresh
FullBodyPaint, 3,8Kaxles, DiscBrakes
17.5LRH commercial tires
1860watts solar,800 AH Battleborn batterys
2020 Silverado HighCountry CC DA 4X4 DRW



blt2ski

Kirkland, Wa

Moderator

Joined: 03/15/2001

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 07/26/23 09:07pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Huntindog wrote:

Cummins12V98 wrote:

It's just that he basically was bad mouthing something he should not have. "Bad transmission it needs more gears", it has gears he could have used them.

Someday the Ram will have more gears as well. Then these conversations will be moot.
My 2001 Dmax had a 5 speed, the 2011 a 6 speed. and the 2020 a 10 speed. Each tranny performed better than it's predessor.
You will agree once you have one


I agree re the more gears is nice! I remember the TH400 POS 3 sp auto in some GM's I had. The NV4500 better than the TH400, a bit better than the SM 4 sp. The 700R4 better than the 4L80E. The 05 5sp ally not bad. My current 6 sp in my 1500 is the best GM auto I've driven. DO have to admit, the 10 sp in the work transit van is the best so far. BUT, dare I say for how I use, don't need the 4.10 gears. The 3.55 I had in the previous 6sp should be better. Probably gain 2 mpg or there about too. I really don't need to be turning 2000 rpm at 60. 1600 was fine with the 6 sp auto transit at 60.
Best pulling transmission has been the Spicer 7sp emanual in my Navistar. The NV 4500 in my 96 6.5td was a good setup too with 4.10's.

Transmissions in general, keep getting better and better! As do engines, and the vehicles themselves generally speaking.

Marty


92 Navistar dump truck, 7.3L 7 sp, 4.33 gears with a Detroit no spin
2014 Chevy 1500 Dual cab 4x4
92 Red-e-haul 12K equipment trailer

4x4ord

Alberta

Senior Member

Joined: 12/23/2010

View Profile



Posted: 07/26/23 09:24pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Cummins12V98 wrote:

It's just that he basically was bad mouthing something he should not have. "Bad transmission it needs more gears", it has gears he could have used them.


The standard output Cummins doesn't have the kind of torque rise that the high output does. More gears behind the Standard Output would help it perform a little better.

As presently tuned, the HO wouldn't benefit much at all by adding gears. If they ever put more gears behind the High Output Cummins they will probably flatten out the torque curve a little bit as well. By doing so they will increase the peak HP some to help it compete a little better with GM and Ford.

FishOnOne

The Great State of Texas

Senior Member

Joined: 02/12/2011

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 07/27/23 09:15am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

4x4ord wrote:

Cummins12V98 wrote:

It's just that he basically was bad mouthing something he should not have. "Bad transmission it needs more gears", it has gears he could have used them.


The standard output Cummins doesn't have the kind of torque rise that the high output does. More gears behind the Standard Output would help it perform a little better.

As presently tuned, the HO wouldn't benefit much at all by adding gears. If they ever put more gears behind the High Output Cummins they will probably flatten out the torque curve a little bit as well. By doing so they will increase the peak HP some to help it compete a little better with GM and Ford.


It seems that since the French took over Chrysler, RAM hasn't really made any significant upgrades. The exception could be their upcoming EV truck and their 1500 ICE trucks midcycle refresh isn't expected to be released until MY 2025.

* This post was edited 07/27/23 09:24am by FishOnOne *


'12 Ford Super Duty FX4 ELD CC 6.7 PSD 400HP 800ft/lbs "270k Miles"
'16 Sprinter 319MKS "Wide Body"


Bionic Man

USA

Senior Member

Joined: 04/03/2009

View Profile



Posted: 07/27/23 01:47pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

The troll has blatantly entered the chat…..


2012 RAM 3500 Laramie Longhorn DRW CC 4x4 Max Tow, Cummins HO, 60 gallon RDS aux fuel tank, Reese 18k Elite hitch
2003 Dodge Ram 3500 QC SB 4x4 Cummins HO NV5600 with Smarty JR, Jacobs EB (sold)
2002 Gulf Stream Sea Hawk 29FRB with Honda EV6010

FishOnOne

The Great State of Texas

Senior Member

Joined: 02/12/2011

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 07/27/23 05:14pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

And so has the RV.net Karen... Along his all new revised mirrors for 2023 [emoticon]

Reply to Topic  |  Subscribe  |  Print Topic  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 7  
Prev  |  Next

Open Roads Forum  >  Tow Vehicles

 > 2023 Power Stroke vs 2023 Ram Cummins Towing Challenge
Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in Tow Vehicles


New posts No new posts
Closed, new posts Closed, no new posts
Moved, new posts Moved, no new posts

Adjust text size:




© 2024 CWI, Inc. © 2024 Good Sam Enterprises, LLC. All Rights Reserved.